I was lucky enough pick our group topic randomly. We drew New Historicism and applied it to the
story “twelve O’Clock News” by Elizabeth Bishop. The stage was set during the
Vietnam war, which was perfect for New Historicism. Elizabeth Bishop was a poet
who was involved emotionally in writing about what it was like living in a poor
unorganized area. As a third world country, Vietnam didn’t have the natural
advances such as industrialization that
most of the world enjoyed. So many people of its home land misinterpreted the
magnitude of what kind of destruction was going on in their own back yard. The
story that Bishop writes discovers this side, or view ,of the Vietnam war that
most Americans civilians never heard of. The New Historic would argue that All
history written about this war is merely subjective. Within the text we find
very graphic warfare of fire and death towards the Saigonese the people. American
literature didn’t write about how one of its fighter pilots single handily destroyed
a boy on his bike by a dirt road in Vietnam. A co-pilot, who was very tickled
to describe this, flew with this pilot in a little FAC plane, writes “Below, a
lone Vietnamese on a bicycle stopped, looked up, dismounted, took up a rifle
and fired; the pilot let him have it with the whole bomb load of napalm- enough
for a platoon.” The way he is tickled makes me sick. Such disgusting views aren’t
very heroic. Many Americans who were seen as defenders for our country came
home as war victors… fully expecting to be hoisted up on the public's shoulders
for their service. I wonder how many of our “hero’s” slipped under the radar
with ruthless acts such as this during this war (or any war for that matter). The
title “Twelve O’Clock News” is implying that the reality of the war was mediated
on TV. However, Bishop shows the side that the twelve O’clock news didn’t. We incorporated
the New Historicism principle into our presentation through the view that no
one story of history is the complete story but merely a piece.
I would have to say that it was a great example you used to relate New Historicism. It is very true how some times we just base our opinions on what we see or hear without even trying to be in their place and see through their eyes what really went on or how they really felt during that time and place.
ReplyDelete