For the history it tells us how the Western europeans were the colonizers and a lot of African and asian countries were the colonized. In the nineteenth century Great Britain was shown to be the largest colonizer of them all controlling almost a quarter of the world's land mass. It was then thought that British people and even Western Europeans were much superior to everyone else and would take over the world as the people with all the power.
For the assumptions it tells us that all postcolonialist critics believe:
- European colonialism did occur.
- The British Empire was at the center of this colonialism.
- The conquerers not only dominated the physical land but also the hegemony or ideology of the colonized peoples.
- The social, political and economic effects of such colonization are still being felt today
In methodology we learn that there are two main approaches to use for textual analysis and they are postcolonial criticism and postcolonial theory.
Also there are three significant questions you can ask when analyzing a postcolonial text and they are:
- Who am I?
- How do I develop into the person i am?
- To what country/countries or to what cultures am i forever linked to?
Postcolonial criticism is actually more interesting than I had thought it was going to be. There are a lot of stories I have read that have to do with this criticism and I never realized it until actually learning about what it actually was. I was surprised that it is still an ongoing thing today because it seems like it it would just be a thing in the past. But it is interesting how it ties together. Very well written post fore it describes the main aspects of postcolonialism.
ReplyDelete